Fields & Smith: A Nail in the Coffin for “Special” Contributions
Discussing Fields & Smith  FamCAFC 57
The recent decision of the Full Court of the Family Court in the case of Fields & Smith has overturned the decision at trial that a husband’s ‘special’ skills warranted an adjustment of the assets of the marriage 60%/40% in the husband’s favour.
The basic facts in Fields & Smith were unremarkable. The husband and wife were married for 29 years and were 54 and 51 years of age respectively at the time of trial. The parties had no assets of significance when they married. The wife was the homemaker and primary carer for the parties’ 3 children throughout the marriage and all 3 children were adults at the time of trial. The husband had built a successful construction company on the Gold Coast and, as a result of the success of the business, the asset pool at the time of trial was approximately $39,000,000.00. At trial the husband received a 10% adjustment in recognition of his ‘special’ skills.
On appeal, the judgment was overturned and Orders made to give effect to an equal division of the assets of the marriage. The Full Court, in assessing the contributions of the parties, determined that there was equality of contributions during the marriage and that one type of contribution should not be treated and less important or less valuable than the other. The wife’s significant contributions as homemaker were not to be treated as less important or less valuable than the husband’s contributions as breadwinner.
Nevertheless, the decision does not impose a presumption of equality of contributions in a long marriage and each case will be determined on its own facts.Contributions, Family Court, Just and Equitable, Marriage, Property
- Which Contact Centre is the right Contact Centre? 24 May 2019
- Rectifying Defective Binding Financal Agreements - Graham & Squibb 24 May 2019
- Sperm Donors and Parental Rights 24 April 2019
- 14 years and $40,000,000 later - the most expensive divorce in Australia has finally concluded! 12 April 2019
- Superannuation Splitting Orders - Bulow v Bulow 28 March 2019